- Budget: 125,000 euros are to be provided in the city budget.
- Funding amount: Up to 2,500 euros grant per case for removal.
- Target group: Private property owners in Jena.
- Background: Initiative of the CDU faction in the City Council.
Jena (21.02.2026) – Anyone who steps out the door in the morning only to find that their freshly painted house facade has been defaced overnight with illegal tags or lettering often faces a major problem. In addition to the annoyance over the property damage, high costs for professional cleaning loom. The city of Jena intends to support private owners in such cases in the future.
Funding Pool Against Facade Nuisance
A new measure is emerging in the Jena City Council intended to support the fight against illegal graffiti on private buildings. Specifically, it is planned to provide a total of 125,000 euros from the municipal budget. This money is intended to serve as a municipal subsidy to subvent the often costly removal of defacements.
The proposal suggests that affected owners can apply for up to 2,500 euros per case to have the damage to their properties removed. This would be a noticeable relief, as specialized cleaning or repainting can quickly cost several thousand euros and is not always covered by insurance.
Initiative from Local Politics
Behind the move is an initiative by the CDU faction in the Jena City Council. Christoph Kepler and his faction colleagues had put the topic on the agenda. The basic idea: A well-maintained cityscape is in the public interest, but the burden of removing vandalism damage has so far rested almost exclusively on the private victims.
The topic is currently being discussed in the committees. This is not about legal street art projects, which can certainly enrich the cityscape at designated areas in Jena, but explicitly about unwanted, illegal paint defacements that often appear overnight on residential and commercial buildings.
Context: Cleanliness and Safety
The discussion is part of broader debates on order and safety in public spaces. Graffiti on private houses is often perceived as a sign of neglect. Rapid removal is considered an effective tool in crime prevention (“Broken Windows Theory”) to deter copycats. If a tag remains for a long time, others often follow quickly.
Whether and exactly when the funding guideline will come into force and how the application process for the citizens of Jena will be designed now depends on the final decisions in the City Council. However, with the provision of funds in the budget, the most important step would be taken.
We will continue to report as soon as details on the application process become known.
Source:
Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions
Transparency Note: This article was created automatically, editorially reviewed, and expanded with AI support.